Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma? How might Dr. Romaros ambivalence toward the death penalty influence his decision to offer a forensic diagnosis of intellectual disability? How might Johns “confession” or his comment about the “boy waiting for the bus” influence the decision? To what extent should these factors play a role in Dr. Romaros report?

University of Phoenix Material

 

Case Study One Worksheet

 

Respond to the following questions in 1,250

  1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?

 

 

 

 

 

  1. How might Dr. Romaro’s ambivalence toward the death penalty influence his decision to offer a forensic diagnosis of intellectual disability? How might John’s “confession” or his comment about the “boy waiting for the bus” influence the decision? To what extent should these factors play a role in Dr. Romaro’s report?

 

 

 

 

 

  1. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.0f, 3.06, 4.04, 4.05, 5.01, 9.01a and 9.06 relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?

 

 

 

 

 

  1. What steps should Dr. Romaro take to ethically implement his decision and monitor its effect?

 

 

 

 

Reference

 

Fisher, C. B. (2013). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

"Order a similar paper and get 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!"

Order Now